🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a misguided assessment of Europe. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" agendas represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument rests on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The true danger confronting the EU is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Divide Between Europe and the US

Statistics paint a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by 87%, compared to a mere 13.5% increase for the EU. During this time, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than major European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly 50% of the global 50 largest tech companies are US-based, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Problem

This widening disparity stems from superior efficiency gains in the US, largely due to technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The scene of world technology dominance is overwhelmingly American. In the last fifty years, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at more than $10bn, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This gap prompts a vital issue: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, where does Europe stand? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race between the US and China, with Europe starting at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several key factors explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a far deeper and agile network for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided rules hamper Europe. A US startup can launch a service under one set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a bigger population size, is split among 27 different national systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has eroded its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for hope. European leaders are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have begun to advance serious reform. Key reports on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the need for sweeping changes.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, these assets might enable far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses significant advantages: skilled workforce, excellent schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these elements could unleash a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still significantly boost productivity by implementing and tailoring advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, the continent's slide in innovation has been steady. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.